The tactical turn
A large part of amateur radio now presents itself as preparation for a disaster that has not happened.
You know the look. Coyote brown and olive drab. Cases with foam cut-outs. MOLLE webbing on a bag that will never leave a car boot. The word comms where the word radio used to be. Grab bags, go boxes, three-day kits, a photograph of a handheld resting on a plate carrier. A man, and it is essentially always a man, who is ready.
The one that gets me is the Peli case with a hole cut in it.
I like Peli cases. They are properly made — an IP67 seal, an automatic pressure valve, a crush rating somebody actually tested to a number. Then a panel-mount socket goes through the wall, and every one of those properties is gone at once. It isn't weatherproof. It isn't submersible. It's a box.
It still looks like a Peli case. That was the point.
There is the argument, in one object: a thing bought for what having it says, then modified until it can no longer do what it was for. Having, against doing. That is the only distinction in this essay, and I should say now that I am not exempt from it.
I find it distasteful. I want to say that first, plainly, so that what follows isn't mistaken for even-handedness. It reads to me as costume — the performance of competence instead of the thing itself, and a fantasy in which somebody else's catastrophe is the moment you finally become important.
There is a word for the far end of it, and it isn't a kind one. Walting.From Walter Mitty, Thurber's daydreamer, by way of the British Army — where being called a Walt is about the worst thing available short of an accusation of cowardice. Wearing the marks of a service you did not do, in front of people who did.
Most of the go-box crowd are not Walts, and I want to be careful not to smear them with it. They are enthusiasts with taste I don't share, and there is nothing wrong with liking how a thing looks. But the aesthetic is borrowed, and it is borrowed from people who earned it in circumstances they would mostly rather not discuss. Somewhere along that spectrum — the morale patches, the affected voice procedure in a hobby that has perfectly good procedure of its own, the photograph of the handheld on the plate carrier — it stops being taste and starts being a claim.
Which is the distinction I started with, worn on the chest. Walting is having without doing, in its purest available form.
But taste isn't the interesting question. The interesting question is whether the hobby benefits, and I don't think the answer is as easy as I'd like.
The case that it helps
It brings numbers, and numbers are the argument that works. Nobody at a regulator has ever been moved by the elegance of a hobby. They are moved by licence counts, by consultation responses, by a constituency. Amateur radio sits on spectrum that is worth a great deal of money to people who would use it for something else, and the defence of that spectrum is, in the end, arithmetic. Every route into the hobby that produces licensees produces ammunition.
It gives the hobby a public-interest story. Emergency communications is the argument that has justified amateur allocations for most of a century. When the grid goes and the cell sites go, here are tens of thousands of trained people with their own equipment and their own power. It is a good story. It has worked.
It reaches people the old route never did, and this is the one that should worry me. The club, the exam class, the elmer, the shop — every one of those required somebody already inside to let you in. That pipeline did not merely happen to be narrow. Being narrow was how it worked: it ran on introduction and approval, and it produced a hobby full of people who had been vouched for.
The prepper route asks nobody's permission. You watch a video, you buy a radio, you start. There is no counter to walk up to and no man behind it deciding whether your interest is yours to have. Some of the people who arrive that way get curious, stay, and turn into the sort of amateur who ends up building an antenna in the rain.
I have to be honest about where that lands. The route I find embarrassing is the route that would have worked for me. A twelve-year-old who could have bought a radio and taught himself, without walking into that shop at all, would not have lost the next thirty-nine years. It reached nobody in 1982 because it did not exist. It exists now, and it is the only way in that does not require being let in.
The case that it hurts
The numbers are shallow. A licence is not an operator — it is a thing you have, not a thing you do. A radio bought against a hypothetical is a radio that is never turned on, and a battery that is flat when it matters. If you defend spectrum by counting licensees, you had better hope nobody audits how many of them have transmitted this year.
The emergency argument is weakening, and leaning on it is dangerous. It was strong when the alternative to amateur radio was nothing. The alternative is no longer nothing.
It misdescribes what the thing is. Amateur radio is one of the last places where an amateur can do real technical work, in public, on shared infrastructure, and have it matter. Propagation is genuinely not solved. Antennas are genuinely hard. There are people receiving weather satellites and tracking aircraft and measuring the ionosphere with equipment they built. To sell all of that as disaster preparation is to sell a physics set as a weapon.
And it repels. This is the part I keep coming back to.
The emergency argument, properly
It was strong when the alternative to amateur radio was nothing. The alternative is now Starlink terminals, satellite messaging in ordinary phones, hardened cellular, and mesh. A hobby whose entire public justification rests on an argument it is losing is a hobby with a problem, and every year spent shouting the weak case louder is a year not spent making the strong one.
In the UK the standing answer to all this is RAYNET, and I want to be careful, because the people in it are volunteers who turn out in the rain, which is more than most of us manage. The problem is not the members. It is that the hobby cites the organisation's existence as though existence were capability.
Look at what it actually is now rather than what it was chartered to be in 1953. An ageing membership and a shrinking one. A callout list weighted heavily towards marshalling charity bike rides and fun runs. Land Rovers specified to within an inch of their lives, magnificently equipped, and mostly parked. Ask when the network was last decisive in an actual emergency and you will not get a date, you will get an anecdote.
That is the having-and-doing problem again, wearing hi-vis. A capability is something you can demonstrate on a bad day. It is not something you can point to on an organisation chart.
And the conversation has moved somewhere the hobby is not in the room for. Operational resilience now means subsea cables and who is loitering above them. It means satellite constellations and the ground segments they quietly depend on. It means drones for damage assessment and search, uncrewed vehicles under the water, and whether the systems everyone relies on fail over to somewhere still standing. Almost all intercontinental data travels through cables lying on the seabed, and the last few years have made it embarrassingly clear how few people it takes to interfere with one.
That is what modern resilience is about. Drones and submarines. It is not Land Rovers and thermos flasks, and nobody at that table is keeping a seat warm for a volunteer with an HF set.
And the honest comparison is not flattering. If what I need is to get a message out when everything local has failed, a satellite messenger costs a couple of hundred pounds, fits in a coat pocket, and needs no licence, no exam, no antenna, no net control and no rota.It is not magic — it depends on satellites, ground stations and a subscription, which are somebody else's infrastructure. But so does the mains socket the go-box charges from. My mother could work one without being taught. It doesn't come in a case with foam cut-outs, and it is better at the job.
So it fails at both ends of the scale. At national level the hobby is not in the room. At personal level it is beaten by something that costs less than a decent antenna and needs no permission to own.
Which leaves the electromagnetic pulse, which is where this argument retreats when the rest of it has gone.
Set aside how you get one — a high-altitude nuclear detonation, or a solar storm on the scale of 1859. Suppose it happens, and suppose your radio lives. You are now the best-informed person in a country with no grid, no water pressure, no fuel distribution and no supply chain. Surviving the pulse was never the hard part. And a transceiver is only worth what is transmitting back: if everyone else's kit is dead, you do not have a network, you have a monologue.
Then there is the box it is sitting in. A Peli case is moulded polypropylene. It is waterproof and it is crushproof and it is not, and never was, a Faraday cage — that needs a sealed conductive enclosure, which is precisely the one thing it is not. So the go-box on the shelf is armoured against water and impact, offers nothing at all against the pulse it is imagined for, and has had its waterproofing drilled out to pass the connectors through.
It is proof against nothing. It only ever looked prepared.
The shop, again
The shop that made me feel stupid in 1982 was not tactical. It had no plate carrier and no go bag. It was a counter, and behind it were men who had decided that the correct response to a boy with an interest was to make him feel that the interest was not his to have.I got there in the end, but I got there at fifty instead of twelve. That's the cost, and it is invisible, because the people who don't come back don't write in to say so.
It is the same instinct. Precisely the same. A claim to belong, made by arranging for somebody else not to. The costume changes with the decade — the knowing counter-hand in 1982, the operator aesthetic now — and underneath it is one move, performed for one reason.
So when I'm asked whether the posturing brings people in, my answer is that it brings some people in, loudly, and quietly keeps others out, and the hobby only ever counts the first group. The twelve-year-old who looks at all that and concludes this is not for people like them does not appear in anybody's statistics. Neither did I, for thirty-nine years.
Where I'm not clean
All of which would be easier to write if I were outside it. I am not, and the proof is on a shelf about three metres from where I am typing.
My favourite radio is a Lab599 Discovery TX-500, and it is the finest object I own.
A milled slab of aluminium, sealed against weather, controls you can work in gloves, and it performs as well as it looks. Somebody thought hard about every millimetre of it, and you can feel that in the hand before you have turned it on.
The Lab599 Discovery TX-500. Photograph to come.
It is also — and I want to be precise, because this is the part that matters — exactly the aesthetic I have spent this whole essay complaining about. Built to be strapped to something. Photograph it on a plate carrier and it would look entirely at home, and that is not an accident of the design. That is the design. I own the best example of the thing.
It gets worse, and more specific. It was built for the field, and I don't take it to the field, because it's too nice. It should be in the woods. That is what it is for. It sits at home instead because I don't want to mark it.
That is the exact charge I have just spent several paragraphs levelling at other people: equipment as an object rather than a tool, kept for what owning it says rather than used for what it does. There is no reading of that where I come out of it well.And unlike the go-box on the shelf, mine has no excuse about a disaster that hasn't happened. I just like it too much to scratch it.
Which makes the Peli case and me two versions of one mistake. He ruins the thing to look the part; I keep mine perfect and never take it anywhere. Opposite errors, identical disease: in both cases having has beaten doing.
Lab599 is Russian. I bought it before February 2022, which settles the money question — nothing I paid has funded anything since — and settles nothing else. I haven't sold it. I don't use it less. I notice the discomfort, and then I go and use the radio.
There is an irony available here about the politics of the tactical crowd and the provenance of the finest QRP radio going, and I'll leave it where it is.
What I actually do with it
I sit in the garden and listen.
Where it actually lives. About fifteen metres from the shack.
Not activations. Not a bag by the door. I carry the most field-capable radio I have ever owned about fifteen metres, put it on a table, and use it to learn morse — slowly, badly, twenty minutes at a time, mostly resenting it, at fifty-six.
Which is either the most ridiculous thing in this essay or the most honest. The least tactical possible use of the most tactical possible object: a man in a garden, receiving, learning something difficult on purpose, with a radio built for a mountainside.
I'd rather be that than ready.
What I think the answer is
On balance: no, the hobby does not benefit — and not because the aesthetic is tasteless. That is only my opinion, and the radio on my shelf disqualifies me from making it.
It doesn't benefit because it trades a strong argument for a weak one. The strong argument for amateur radio's spectrum is that it is a working laboratory: people doing real measurement, building real antennas, and publishing what they find, at a scale no institution funds and no company would bother with. That case is true, it is checkable, and it gets stronger every year as the equipment gets cheaper and the software gets better. It is an argument from what people do, which is precisely why it can be checked.
The disaster story is an argument from what people have. It is not checkable, it is getting weaker, and it requires everybody to dress up.
I would rather the hobby made the argument it can win. And I would rather a child looking through a shop window at something they don't understand yet saw a set of instruments, and not a uniform.
That's what I was looking at in 1982. It cost £50, and it was going to be mine, and nobody needed to be ready for anything.